Change: Volume here an issue. Would have to have a cap. If volume became too much the surrogate library would have to become their own LAND stop.In areas where travel is difficult, like the North Country, have three smaller hubs. Some of the couriers are traveling in these areas already.   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 1138)

Change:  pay $xxRegarding Another thought...:Is it possible for the library to offer all of these options to the users (or for the library to choose the delivery method on a case-by-case basis) or does the library need to choose one of the options and stick with it?   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 948)

Change: via LAND. The system would be a LAND stop but not the individual libraries within the system.This model would avoid having the system be a processing/sorting center, which could be a plus. What would need to be considered is workflow on the part of the lending library.   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 566)

Change: Each hub would agree to distribute items received in LAND to its member libraries through its own delivery system. There would be no change in   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 410)